ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefiventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? Already on GitHub? In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . can u test ? Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. Format UDF in Windows: format x: /fs:udf /q https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso. your point) and you also want them to actually do their designated job, including letting you know, if you have Secure Boot enabled, when some third party UEFI boot loader didn't pass Secure Boot validation, even if that boot loader will only ever be run from someone who has to have physical access to your computer in the first place. 3. 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. Does shim still needed in this case? Sorry for my ignorance. So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. Inspection of the filesystem within the iso image shows the boot file(s) - including the UEFI bootfile - in the respective directory. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. The only way to make Ventoy boot in secure boot is to enroll the key. I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). The point is that if a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, they are responsible for anything that they then subsequently run using Ventoy. relativo a la imagen iso a utilizar Hiren's BootCD Getting the same error as @rderooy. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key, it uses Shim from Fedora (or, more precisely, from Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk). I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. Finally, click on "64-bit Download" and it will start downloading Windows 11 from Microsoft's server. Some bioses have a bug. they reviewed all the source code). This means current is MIPS64EL UEFI mode. Go ahead and download Rufus from here. Then congratulations: You have completely removed any benefits of using Secure Boot for any person who enrolled Ventoy on their Secure Boot computer. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. Please refer github issue/1975, x86 Legacy BIOS, IA32 UEFI, x86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. ***> wrote: You can grab latest ISO files here : Hi MFlisar , if you want use that now with HBCD you must extract the iso but the ventoy.dat on the root of the iso recreate the iso with example: ntlite oder oder tools and than you are able to boot from. They can't eliminate them totally, but they can provide an additional level of protection. KANOTIX uses a hybrid ISO layout, it definitely has X64 UEFI in ISO9660 and FAT12 (usually 1MiB offset). How to suppress iso files under specific directory . If Secure Boot is enabled, signature validation of any chain loaded, If the signature validation fails (i.e. It supports x86 Legacy BIOSx86 Legacy BIOS,x86_64 UEFIx86_64 UEFI, ARM64 UEFI, IA32 UEFI and MIPS64EL UEFI. If that was the case, I would most likely sign Ventoy for my SHIM (provided it doesn't let through unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled, which is the precise issue we are trying to solve) since, even if it's supposed to be a competitor of Rufus, I think it's a very nice solution and I'm always more than happy to direct people who would like to have a multiboot version of Rufus to use Ventoy instead. PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. I rarely get any problems with other menu systems based on grub2\grub4dos\syslinux\isolinux, just Ventoy gives problems. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. Best Regards. EFI Blocked !!!!!!! Even debian is problematic with this laptop. Would be nice if this could be supported in the future as well. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. Maybe because of partition type I cannot boot into Ventoy with Secure Boot enabled on my machine though, it only boots when I disable Secure Boot in BIOS. Secure Boot is disabled in the BIOS on both systems, and the ISO boots just fine if I write it directly to a USB stick with Fedora Image Writer. Tried it yesterday. Reply. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. @ventoy Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. my pleasure and gladly happen :) MEMZ.img is 4K and Ventoy does not list it in it's menu system. 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. Ventoy should only allow the execution of Secure Boot signed executables when Secure Boot is enabled, Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. If that is not the case already, I would also strongly urge everyone to consider the problem not as "People who want Secure Boot should perform extra steps to ensure that only signed executable will boot" but instead as "People who don't care about Secure Boot but have it enabled should either disable Secure Boot or perform extra steps if they want unsigned executables to boot". to your account, Hi ! It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. Tried with archlinux-2021.05.01-x86_64 which is listed as compatible and it is working flawlessly. Ventoy is supporting almost all of Arch-based Distros well. My guesd is it does not. Ventoy can boot any wim file and inject any user code into it. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. When user check the Secure boot support option then only run .efi file with valid signature is select. Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? All the .efi/kernel/drivers are not modified. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and @steve6375 But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". I have a solution for this. I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. @pbatard Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file Sign in Option 2: bypass secure boot These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. Yes, I already understood my mistake. Secure Boot is supported since Ventoy-1.0.07, please use the latest version and see the Notes. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. Thanks! The current Secure Boot implementation should be renamed from "Secure Boot support" to "Secure Boot circumvention/bypass", the documentation should state about its pros and cons, and Ventoy should probably ask to delete enrolled key (or at least include KeyTool, it's open-source). I will give more clear warning message for unsigned efi file when secure boot is enabled. I made a VHD of an arch installation and installed the vtoyboot mod and it keeps on giving me the no UEFI error. So, this is debatable. Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. Users may run into issues with Ventoy not working because of corrupt ISO files, which will create problems when booting an image file. Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. Any kind of solution? Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. Sign in You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. Use UltraISO for example and open Minitool.iso 4. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added ISO file: "Win10SupperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso" If you allow someone physical access to your Secure Boot-enabled system, and you have not disabled USB booting in the BIOS (or booting from CD\DVD), then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. las particiones seran gpt, modo bios I used Rufus on a new USB with the same iso image, and when I booted to it with UEFI it booted successfully. By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. It says that no bootfile found for uefi. P.S. to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. fdisk: Create a primary partition with partition type EFI (FAT-12/16/32). Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" hello everyone Using ventoy, if I try to install the ISO. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. Let the user access their computer (fat chance they're going to remove the heatsink and thermal paste to see if their CPU was changed, especially if, as far as they are concerned, no change as occurred and both the computer appearance and behaviour are indistinguishable from usual). OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! There are many kinds of WinPE. To create a USB stick that is compatible with USB 3.0 using the native boot experience of the Windows 10 Technical Preview media (or Windows 8/Windows 8.1), use DiskPart to format the USB stick and set the partition to active, then copy all of the files from inside the ISO . They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. Aporteus which is Arch Linux based version of Porteus , is best , fastest and greatest distro i ever met , it's fully modular , supports bleeding edge techs like zstd , have a tool to very easily compile and use latest version of released or RC kernel directly from kernel.org ( Kernel Builder ) , have a tool to generate daily fresh ISO so all the packages are daily and fresh ( Aporteus ISO Builder ) , you can have multi desktops on a ISO and on boot select whatever you like , it has naturally Copy to RAM feature with flag to copy specific modules only so linux run at huge speed , a lot of tools and softwares along side mini size ISO , and it use very very low ram and ISO size, You can generate ISO with whatever language you like to distro have. Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. Again, detecting malicious bootloaders, from any media, is not a bonus. Thus, on a system where Secure Boot is enabled, users should rightfully expect to be alerted if the EFI bootloader of an ISO booted through Ventoy is not Secure Boot signed or if its signature doesn't validate. Just some of my thoughts: privacy statement. # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). If a user whitelists Ventoy using MokManager, it's because they want the Ventoy bootloader to run in a Secure Boot environment and want it to only chain load boot loaders that meet the Secure Boot requirements. Open net installer iso using archive manager in Debian (pre-existing system). I'm not talking about CSM. How to make sure that only valid .efi file can be loaded. Is there any progress about secure boot support? How to Perform a Clean Install of Windows 11. No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi error, asus t100ta Kinda solved: Cant install arch, but can install linux mint 64 bit. ", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin fails to boot on BIOS & UEFI. 6. Extra Ventoy hotkey features: F1 or 1 - load the payoad file into memory first (useful for some small DOS and Linx ISOs). Download non-free firmware archive. try 1.0.09 beta1? preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532, [issue]: Instead of dm-patch, consider a more secure and upstreamable solution that does not do kernel taint. @ventoy, I've tested it only in qemu and it worked fine. 5. I really fail to fathom how people here are disputing that if someone agrees to enroll Ventoy in a Secure Boot environment, it only means that they agree to trust the Ventoy application, and not that they grant it the right to just run whatever bootloader anybody will now be able to throw at their computer through Ventoy (which may very well be a malicious bootloader ran by someone who is not the owner of that computer but who knows or hopes that the user enrolled Ventoy). I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time. and windows password recovery BootCD I see your point, this CorePlus ISO is indeed missing that EFI file. Will these functions in Ventoy be disabled if Secure Boot is detected? If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. to your account, MB: GA-P110-D3, CPU: Intel Core i5 6400, RAM: 8GB DDR4, GPU: IGFX + NVIDIA GT730, MB: GA-H81M-S2PV, CPU : Intel Core i3 4650, RAM 8GB DDR3 GPU: IGFX, slitaz-rolling-core-5in1.iso I should also note that the key used in Ventoy is the same used in Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk, my key. Once here, scroll down and move to the "Download Windows 11 Disk Image (ISO) for x64 devices" section. However, considering that in the case of Ventoy, you are basically going to chain load GRUB 2, and that most of the SHIMs have been designed to handle precisely that, it might be easier to get Ventoy accepted as a shim payload. @pbatard, if that's what what your concern, that could be easily fixed by deleting grubia32.efi and grubx64.efi in /EFI/BOOT, and renaming grubia32_real.efi grubia32.efi, grubx64_real.efi grubx64.efi. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. I didn't try install using it though. Ventoy does not always work under VBox with some payloads. I'm considering two ways for user to select option 1. it doesn't support Bluetooth and doesn't have nvidia's proprietary drivers but it's very easy to install. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. Again, the major problem I see with this fine discussion is that everybody appears to be tiptoeing around the fact that some users have no clue what Secure Boot is intended for (only that, because it says "Secure" they don't want to turn it off), and, rather than trying to educate them about that, we're trying to find ways to keep them "feeling safe" when the choices they might make would leave their system anything but. I will test it in a realmachine later. If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI. screenshots if possible My guess is it does not. You are receiving this because you commented. Any way to disable UEFI booting capability from Ventoy and only leave legacy? can u fix now ? privacy statement. That's not at all how I see it (and from what I read above also not @ventoy sees it). Joined Jul 18, 2020 Messages 4 Trophies 0 . Code that is subject to such a license that has already been signed might have that signature revoked. Remain what in the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe . This disk, after being installed on a USB flash drive and booted from, effectively disables Secure Boot protection features and temporary allows to perform almost all actions with the PC as if Secure Boot is disabled. Parrot-security-4.9.1_x64.iso - 3.8 GB, eos-eos3.7-amd64-amd64.200310-013107.base.iso - 2.83 GB, minimal_linux_live_15-Dec-2019_64-bit_mixed.iso - 18.9 MB, OracleLinux-R7-U3-Server-x86_64-dvd.iso - 4.64 GB, backbox-6-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.51 GB document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); If you have a tech problem, we probably covered it! You don't need anything special to create a UEFI bootable Arch USB. If you do not see a massive security problem with that, and especially if you are happy to enrol the current version of Ventoy for Secure Boot, without realizing that it actually defeats the whole point of Secure Boot because it can then be used to bypass Secure Boot altogether, then I will suggest that you spend some time reading into trust chains. Freebsd has some linux compatibility and also has proprietary nvidia drivers. . I made a larger MEMZ.img and that runs on Easy2Boot and grubfm in VBOX but it goes wrong booting via Ventoy for some reason. Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: tails-amd64-4.5.iso Legacy tested with VM @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. FFS I just spent hours reinstalling arch just to get this in the end archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64.iso with Ventoy 1.0.47 boots for me on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 UEFI64 boot. Single x64 ISO - OK - Works and install.esd found by Setup - all Editions listed Dual 32+64 ISO - FAIL - Did not find install.esd file (either 64 or 32) \x64\sources\ and \x32\sources in ISO UEFI64 Boot: Single x64 ISO - FAIL - 'No boot file found by UEFI' ' Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!' However the solution is not perfect enough. Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea). Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. As I understand, you only tested via UEFI, right? Also tested on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 16GB OK (UEFI64). So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. It's a pain in the ass to do yes, but I wouldn't qualify it as very hard. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. Can I reformat the 1st (bigger) partition ? Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. However, I guess it should be possible to automatically enroll ALL needed keys to shim from grub module on the first boot (when the user enrolls my ENROLL_THIS_CERT_INTO_MOKMANAGER.crt) and handle unsigned efi binaries as a special case or just require to sign them with user-generated key? If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. Can't say for others, but I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, but the solution is not perfect enough. - . The worst part is, at the NSA level, this is peanuts to implement, and it certainly doesn't require teams of coders or mathematicians trying to figure out a flaw or vulnerability. downloaded from: http://old-dos.ru/dl.php?id=15030. Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. 04-23-2021 02:00 PM. Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. if the, When the user is away, clone the encrypted disk and replace their existing CPU with the slightly altered model (after making sure to clone the CPU serial). The point of this issue is that people are under the impression that because Ventoy supports Secure Boot, they will get the same level of "security" booting Secure Boot compliant media through Ventoy as if they had booted that same media directly, which is indeed a fair expectation to have, since the whole point of boot media creation software is to have the converted media behave as close as possible as the original would. With that with recent versions, all seems to work fine. This is also known as file-rolller. If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : I hope there will be no issues in this adoption. Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! @pbatard, have you tested it? Unable to boot properly. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. After the reboot, select Delete MOK and click Continue. You can reformat it with FAT32/NTFS/UDF/XFS/Ext2/Ext3/Ext4 filesystem, the only request is that Cluster Size must greater than or equal to 2048. VMware or VirtualBox) also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* @steve6375 This solution is only for Legacy BIOS, not UEFI. @ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. No, you don't need to implement anything new in Ventoy. Thanks. You can open the ISO in 7zip and look for yourself. Are you using an grub2 External Menu (F6)? Yes, anybody can make a UEFI bootloader that chain loads unsigned bootloaders with the express purpose of defeating Secure Boot. maybe that's changed, or perhaps if there's a setting somewhere to But, currently, that is not the case at all, which means that, independently of the merits of Secure Boot for this or that type of media (which is a completely different debate altogether), there is a breach of the security contract that the user expects to see enforced and therefore something that needs to be addressed. 8 Mb. Not associated with Microsoft. accomodate this. Tested on ASUS K40IN ? This could be useful for data recovery, OS re-installation, or just for booting from USB without thinking about additional steps. Ventoy also supports BIOS Legacy. In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. @ValdikSS, I'm not seeing much being debated, when the link you point to appears to indicate that pretty much everybody is in agreement that loading unsigned kernels from GRUB, in a Secure Boot environment, is a bug (hence why it was reported as such). I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. Do I still need to display a warning message? Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. 6. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. Remove Ventoy secure boot key. Yes. But it shouldn't be to the user to do that. I am not using a grub external menu. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. This completely defeats Secure Boot and should not happen, as the only EFI bootloader that should be whitelisted for Secure Boot should be Ventoy itself, and any other EFI bootloader should still be required to pass Secure Boot validation. You can press left or right arrow keys to scroll the menu. Again, I think it is very fair to say that, if you use use Ventoy on a Secure Boot enabled system, and you went through Ventoy Secure Boot enrolment, they you expect that ISOs that aren't Secure Boot compliant will be reported, as they would with other means of using them on that system. fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. If anyone has Secure Boot enabled, there should be no scenario where an unsigned bootloader gets executed without at least a big red warning, even if the user indicated that they were okay with that. Does it work on these machines (real or emulated) by booting it from a CDR / .iso image? The main annoyance in my view is that it requires 2 points of contact for security updates (per https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review) and that I have some doubts that Microsoft will allow anything but a formal organization with more than a couple of people to become a SHIM provider. edited edited edited edited Sign up for free . I would assert that, when Secure Boot is enabled, every single time an unsigned bootloader is loaded, a warning message should be displayed. Well occasionally send you account related emails. Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. So that means that Ventoy will need to use a different key indeed. Paragon ExtFS for Windows If you use the Linux kernel's EFI stub loader or ELILO, you may need to store your kernel on the ESP, so creating an ESP on the large end of the scale is advisable. Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly.
Corriente Cattle Vs Longhorn, Articles V